Loading the registry…
BorealHost.ai MCP server — agent-native web hosting tools
The publisher performed an authenticated act of publication — proving control of a namespace in the official MCP registry, or appearing in a first-party catalogue an operator curates. That establishes WHO published it. It is not a security finding, and attested artifacts carry Flagged verdicts too.
github: https://github.com/alainsvrd/borealhost-mcp, 12 findings
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- borealhost-mcp
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
5 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
5 findings · 8.0s
v0.3.26
2 findings · 1.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 27.5s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 27.5s
v2.3.8
5 findings · 1.4s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.71.0
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
No report in this scan: nerlo-multi-source.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2026 | Flagged61 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicabletrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 12 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
2 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/mcp_server/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/mcp_server/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 AAK-SEC-MD-001
Files: SECURITY.md · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SUPPLY-004
Files: pyproject.toml · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME
Files: /repo/mcp_server/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1616
Files: /repo/requirements.txt · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1617
Files: /repo/requirements.txt · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1618
Files: /repo/requirements.txt · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3482
Files: /repo/requirements.txt · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3483
Files: /repo/requirements.txt · reported by osv-scanner
Multiple high-severity vulnerabilities in artifact dependencies
The artifact includes dependencies with multiple high-severity vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities, identified by PYSEC-2026-1616, PYSEC-2026-1617, PYSEC-2026-1618, PYSEC-2026-3482, and PYSEC-2026-3483 in `/repo/requirements.txt`, could potentially enable remote code execution or denial of service. Further investigation into these specific dependency issues is warranted.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.