Loading the registry…
AI-assisted screenshot renamer for macOS using local Ollama vision models.
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
6 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI. Review the scanned source before copying them into your own project.
nerlo install -- screenshot-genius
5 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 0.5s
v2.0.11
12 findings · 6.9s
v0.3.74
0 findings · 0.7s
v0.1.0
2 findings · 2.8s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 2.8s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.7s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 14 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 6 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
6 COMMAND_INJECTION_JS_CHILD_PROCESS
Files: /repo/scripts/health-check.js, /repo/server.js · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/server.js, /repo/scripts/health-check.js · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 DATA_EXFIL_JS_FS_ACCESS
Files: /repo/server.js · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-dynamic-exec
Files: /repo/server.js · reported by nerlo-behavioral
1 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-js-secret-to-network-egress
Files: /repo/server.js · reported by nerlo-behavioral
1 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Critical command injection and data exfiltration risks identified.
The artifact contains critical command injection vulnerabilities in `server.js` and `health-check.js`, allowing for arbitrary shell execution. It also exhibits high-severity data exfiltration capabilities from `server.js`, including file system access and network egress of secrets. Dynamic code execution is also present in `server.js`.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.