Loading the registry…
Test MCP server repository created via Copilot
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
217 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- my-test-mcp-server
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
5 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 0.5s
v2.0.11
620 findings · 69.4s
v0.3.74
2 findings · 2.1s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.7s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.7s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.6s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 622 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 217 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 553 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
44 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/app-launcher-agent/node_modules/.package-lock.json, /repo/app-launcher-agent/node_modules/.bin/ts-node-esm, /repo/app-launcher-agent/node_modules/.bin/ts-node.cmd and 24 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
19 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo/app-launcher-agent/node_modules/make-error, /repo/app-launcher-agent/node_modules/yn, /repo/app-launcher-agent/node_modules/@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec and 16 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 EXCESSIVE_FILE_COUNT
Files: /repo/app-launcher-agent/., /repo/app-launcher-agent/node_modules/typescript/., /repo/app-launcher-agent/node_modules/ts-node/. · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 OVERSIZED_FILE
Files: /repo/app-launcher-agent/node_modules/typescript/lib/typescript.js · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
553 The review call did not complete.
Rules: COMMAND_INJECTION_EVAL, COMMAND_INJECTION_JS_CHILD_PROCESS, SECRET_PASSWORD_VAR and 9 more · Files: /repo/app-launcher-agent/dist/appHandlers/calculator.js, /repo/app-launcher-agent/dist/appHandlers/notepad.js, /repo/app-launcher-agent/dist/appHandlers/sublimeText.js and 83 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit
Critical command injection and code execution risks
The artifact contains critical command injection vulnerabilities and JavaScript child process execution risks in several application handlers, including `calculator.js`, `notepad.js`, `sublimeText.js`, and `microsoftTeams.js`. These findings indicate a capability for shell execution. Medium severity findings also point to the presence of potential password variables. The artifact can perform network egress and file system access.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.
Showing 23 of 23; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.