Loading the registry…
Convert document collections to verified Markdown, package them encrypted, and expose them to agents over MCP
The publisher performed an authenticated act of publication — proving control of a namespace in the official MCP registry, or appearing in a first-party catalogue an operator curates. That establishes WHO published it. It is not a security finding, and attested artifacts carry Flagged verdicts too.
2 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner, 1 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
pypi: mdcx @ 1.3.5, 0 findings
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- mdcx
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
5 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
6 findings · 6.9s
v0.3.74
9 findings · 3.5s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 6.5s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.71.0
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2026 | Flagged74 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: completetrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicabletrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 15 findings across every scanner that examined this package. 1 of 2 findings rated critical by their scanner was among the dismissals.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
4 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: YARA_sql_injection_generic, AAK-IPI-WILD-CORPUS-001, YARA_code_execution_generic and 1 more · Files: /repo/tests/test_stress.py, tests/test_stress.py, /repo/tests/test_entrypoints.py · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
2 AAK-DNS-REBIND-002
Files: pyproject.toml · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 AAK-SECRET-004
Files: src/mdcx/archive.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: pyproject.toml · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SEC-MD-001
Files: SECURITY.md · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SUPPLY-004
Files: pyproject.toml · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH
Files: /repo/src/mdcx/convert/__init__.py · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 SQL_INJECTION_STRING_FORMAT
Files: /repo/src/mdcx/archive.py · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Critical SQL injection and high-severity findings present
The artifact contains a critical SQL injection vulnerability in `/repo/src/mdcx/archive.py`, which could lead to unauthorized database access. High-severity findings include potential DNS rebind risks identified in `pyproject.toml` and exposed credentials within `src/mdcx/archive.py`. Additionally, a known vulnerability (CVE-2026-52869) is present in `pyproject.toml`, which may introduce further risks.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.