Loading the registry…
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI. Review the scanned source before copying them into your own project.
nerlo install -- kentaroh7777/speech-to-text
5 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
2 findings · 0.5s
v2.0.11
11 findings · 6.8s
v0.3.74
2 findings · 1.6s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.4s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.4s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.9s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 15 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 15 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
15 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: permissions-no-deny-list, AAK-TRUST-004, DATA_EXFIL_NETWORK_REQUESTS and 5 more · Files: settings.local.json, .claude/settings.local.json, /repo/src/transcriber/downloader.py and 4 more · reported by agentshield, agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner
Critical findings indicate potential for sensitive data exposure and network egress.
Critical findings from the bearer scanner in `cli.py`, `transcriber.py`, and `x_spaces_downloader.py` indicate potential for sensitive data exposure or insecure operations. High severity findings in `settings.local.json` suggest potential credential access or insecure permissions. The artifact also exhibits undeclared network requests and data exfiltration capabilities, as identified by medium severity findings from cisco-skill-scanner.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.