Loading the registry…
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- MiniMCP
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
8 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
2 findings · 9.2s
v0.3.74
0 findings · 1.0s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.8s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.8s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | Flagged88 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock: completenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicable |
vv0.3.2
2 findings · 8.0s
v0.71.0
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
13 findings · 0.8s
vv1.6.0
8 findings · 4.2s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
| completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 25 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
2 CAPABILITY_UNSAFE_POINTER
Reported by capslock
2 GO-2026-5026
Files: /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-5942
Files: /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-5972
Files: http.go, /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-6088
Files: /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-6089
Files: /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-6090
Files: /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-6091
Files: /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-6218
Files: /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
1 GO-2026-4970
Files: /repo/go.mod · reported by osv-scanner
1 GO-2026-5037
Files: /repo/go.mod · reported by osv-scanner
1 GO-2026-5038
Files: /repo/go.mod · reported by osv-scanner
1 GO-2026-5039
Files: /repo/go.mod · reported by osv-scanner
1 GO-2026-5856
Files: /repo/go.mod · reported by osv-scanner
1 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
High-severity vulnerabilities and unsafe pointer usage found.
The artifact contains high-severity vulnerabilities, including one related to unsafe pointer usage that could enable direct memory manipulation. An additional high-severity vulnerability (GO-2026-5972) is present in a dependency used by the artifact, specifically in `http.go`. These findings indicate potential for shell execution, data corruption, or other significant impacts.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.