Loading the registry…
Model Context Protocol server for Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
1 critical finding reported by cisco-skill-scanner, 0 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- mcp-oci-server
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
7 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 0.6s
v2.0.11
4 findings · 7.4s
v0.3.74
7 findings · 1.6s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.3s
v0.1.0
1 finding · 3.3s
v0.71.0
16 findings · 0.3s
v2.3.8
38 findings · 8.6s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.9s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2026 | Flagged41 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 66 findings across every scanner that examined this package. 1 of 1 finding rated critical by their scanner was among the dismissals.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 6 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
1 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: COMMAND_INJECTION_JS_CHILD_PROCESS · Files: /repo/tests/oci-tools.test.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
3 AAK-ANTHROPIC-SDK-001
Files: src/index-simple.ts, src/index-readonly.ts, src/index.ts · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-f886-m6hf-6m8v
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-mh99-v99m-4gvg
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-v6h2-p8h4-qcjw
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 AAK-DNS-REBIND-002
Files: package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-OAUTH-3P-001
Files: package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SUPPLY-005
Files: package-lock.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CVE-2025-13465
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-13466
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-15284
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-65945
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-66414
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-69873
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-0621
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-12590
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-2391
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-25536
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-2950
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-41907
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-4800
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-4923
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-4926
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-8723
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 GHSA-27v5-c462-wpq7
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-345p-7cg4-v4c7
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-4x5r-pxfx-6jf8
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-869p-cjfg-cm3x
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-8r9q-7v3j-jr4g
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-f23m-r3pf-42rh
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-h67p-54hq-rp68
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-j3q9-mxjg-w52f
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-mh29-5h37-fv8m
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-q8mj-m7cp-5q26
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-r5fr-rjxr-66jc
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-v422-hmwv-36x6
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-w7fw-mjwx-w883
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-wqch-xfxh-vrr4
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 The model did not answer for these findings.
Rules: GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION · Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/SKILL.md · reported by osv-scanner, cisco-skill-scanner
3 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: AAK-SEC-MD-001, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-shell-inline-command, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: SECURITY.md, /repo/README.md, /repo/SKILL.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, nerlo-install-instruction, cisco-skill-scanner
High-severity vulnerabilities, network egress, and SDK usage detected.
The artifact includes code that uses the Anthropic SDK, which typically performs network egress for API communication, identified in `src/index-readonly.ts`, `src/index-simple.ts`, and `src/index.ts`. A DNS rebinding vulnerability in `package.json` could also enable network egress to arbitrary hosts. Numerous high-severity vulnerabilities are present in dependencies listed in `package-lock.json`, posing risks such as remote code execution or information disclosure. These findings collectively indicate significant potential for external communication and compromise.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Showing 25 of 25; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.