Loading the registry…
Find configuration literals that were hardcoded inline instead of centralized in a constants class — server/UNC paths, URLs and endpoints, connection strings, hosts, IPs, emails, ports, and any credential in source (always a blocker). Use when reviewing C# changes for configuration centralization, and also on softer phrasings that mean the same thing: "magic strings", "hardcoded values", "these paths should be constants", "is anything environment-specific in here", "any secrets committed", or a general C# review where paths and URLs appear in the diff. The regex scanner alone misses composed and interpolated strings, so this skill pairs it with the manual passes that catch them.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
5 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner, 3 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'sebastianalbu/ai-autopilot (appconstants-audit)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'sebastianalbu/ai-autopilot (appconstants-audit)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
113 findings · 21.9s
v0.3.74
5 findings · 15.5s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 8.3s
v0.1.0
8 findings · 8.4s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.9s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 126 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 5 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 58 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
33 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: COMPOUND_EXTRACT_EXECUTE, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact · Files: /repo/.github/skills/docx/SKILL.md, /repo/.github/skills/embedded-c-rules/SKILL.md, /repo/.github/skills/token-saver/SKILL.md and 30 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, nerlo-install-instruction
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
33 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/plugins/ai-autopilot/skills/embedded-c-rules/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/ai-autopilot/skills/token-saver/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/ai-autopilot/skills/sple-standards/SKILL.md and 30 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 EXCESSIVE_FILE_COUNT
Files: /repo/plugins/ai-autopilot/. · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/plugins/ai-autopilot/skills/.anthropic-skills.lock.json · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
51 The review call did not complete.
Rules: YARA_credential_harvesting_generic, COMPOUND_EXTRACT_EXECUTE, AAK-MARKETPLACE-001 and 5 more · Files: /repo/plugins/ai-autopilot/skills/polyspace-baseline/SKILL.md, /repo/.github/skills/polyspace-baseline/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/ai-autopilot/skills/docx/SKILL.md and 38 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit
7 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact · Files: /repo/README.md, /repo/install.sh, /repo/plugins/ai-autopilot/agents/pr-review-orchestrator.agent.md and 1 more · reported by nerlo-install-instruction
Critical findings indicate credential access and sensitive operations.
The artifact presents critical security findings, including potential for credential access and sensitive operations. Critical YARA findings indicate credential harvesting within `SKILL.md` files in both `.github/skills` and `plugins/ai-autopilot/skills` paths. Additional critical findings from 'bearer' are present in various script files, suggesting potential for code execution or sensitive data handling. High severity findings also highlight marketplace configuration files.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.
Showing 7 of 7; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.