Loading the registry…
Generalized self-learning loop for the CDISC Case 3 pipeline. Distil durable, per-skill lessons from the reviewer feedback captured during a run across ALL THREE review gates (plan / specs / TLFs). Reads /workspace/review_feedback.jsonl — one object per revise, each tagged with the skill it targets (tlf-planner, tlf-analysis-spec, tlf-generator) — plus the approved artifacts and each target skill's current references/lessons-learned.md; proposes an append-only markdown block per revised skill that would have produced an approvable result first pass. Writes { hasLessons, lessons: [ { skill, lessonAppendMarkdown } ], prTitle, prBody, summary } to /output/result.json. Append-only — never rewrites existing lessons. Triggers: 'learn from review feedback', 'propose skill lessons', 'codify reviewer comments into the skills', 'self-learning loop'. Used by the propose-skill-update agent step after the pipeline's reviews.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'appsilon/cdisc-case-3 (propose-skill-lesson)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'appsilon/cdisc-case-3 (propose-skill-lesson)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
132 findings · 19.6s
v0.3.74
11 findings · 10.5s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.4s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.4s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.0s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
This review has not run for this scan yet. It runs once per scan, in the background, and is kept; it appears here when it has. Until then all 143 findings above stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity.