Local MCP server for designing and scoring practical AI-agent evaluations.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- kryve-agent-eval-mcp
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
8 of 12 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 1.0s
v2.0.11
3 findings · 9.0s
v0.3.74
1 finding · 1.3s
v2.0.2
0 findings · 7.3s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.2s
v0.71.0
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
0 findings · 7.4s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 2.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2026 | Clean100 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completebearer: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
A model re-read every finding on this page and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Clean badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
This review did not run for this scan. All 4 findings above stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity. No finding here has been checked and cleared.