Loading the registry…
The publisher performed an authenticated act of publication — proving control of a namespace in the official MCP registry, or appearing in a first-party catalogue an operator curates. That establishes WHO published it. It is not a security finding, and attested artifacts carry Flagged verdicts too.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- manifold
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
6 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
21 findings · 14.0s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2026 | Caution98 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: complete | completed |
Per-scanner history:
v0.3.26
0 findings · 5.4s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 34.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 34.2s
v0.71.0
0 findings · 0.9s
v2.3.8
0 findings · 1.9s
v1.4.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.4s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 17.5s
No report in this scan: capslock, govulncheck, trivy_image.
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Caution badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 21 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
10 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/examples/SKILL.md, /repo/.github/SKILL.md, /repo/examples/openapi-backend/SKILL.md and 2 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
4 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.gemini/styleguide.md, /repo/.go-version, /repo/.goreleaser.prerelease.yaml and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/.gemini/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/.gemini/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 EXCESSIVE_FILE_COUNT
Files: /repo/. · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME
Files: /repo/.gemini/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Artifact contains hidden data files and numerous components.
The artifact includes hidden data files, which could indicate unexpected data storage or execution paths. It also contains an excessive number of files, potentially increasing its footprint or complexity. Additionally, the manifest has a vague description and lacks license information, which may hinder proper identification and usage.
Concern level assessed by the review: Low. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.