releases · Nerlo

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 250
Dismissed as false positives: 1
Not reviewed: 4

Out of 255 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 2 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 4 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

1 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: GHSA-f88m-g3jw-g9cj · Files: /repo/workers/webhooks/test/echo-subscriber/bun.lock · reported by osv-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

6 GHSA-frvp-7c67-39w9
Files: /repo/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/package-lock.json and 3 more · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
4 GHSA-2gcr-mfcq-wcc3
Files: /repo/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/package-lock.json and 1 more · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-35p6-xmwp-9g52
Files: /repo/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-3hrh-pfw6-9m5x
Files: /repo/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/package-lock.json and 1 more · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-4c8g-83qw-93j6
Files: /repo/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/package-lock.json and 1 more · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-88fw-hqm2-52qc
Files: /repo/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/package-lock.json and 1 more · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-f577-qrjj-4474

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-11525
Files: bun.lock · reported by trivy

Not reviewed

4 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: skills-missing-telemetry-commands/discover-changelog.md, skills-missing-telemetry-.claude/commands/discover-changelog.md, skills-missing-governance-commands/discover-changelog.md and 1 more · Files: commands/discover-changelog.md, .claude/commands/discover-changelog.md · reported by agentshield

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and sensitive data access risks identified

The artifact contains critical vulnerabilities in its dependencies, as indicated by `GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw` and `GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p` in `/repo/bun.lock`. High-severity findings from `agentshield` indicate potential for prompt extraction from `.claude/agents/overview-writer.md` and `agents/overview-writer.md`. Additionally, `permissions-no-deny-list` in `.claude/settings.json` and `settings.json` suggests broad permissions, and `hooks-sensitive-file-1241` points to sensitive file access in `scripts/setup-worktree.sh`.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/bun.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p · /repo/bun.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
agents-prompt-extraction-135 · .claude/agents/overview-writer.md · high · reported by agentshield
agents-prompt-extraction-683 · .claude/agents/overview-writer.md · high · reported by agentshield
agents-prompt-extraction-928 · .claude/agents/overview-writer.md · high · reported by agentshield
permissions-no-deny-list · .claude/settings.json · high · reported by agentshield
agents-prompt-extraction-135 · agents/overview-writer.md · high · reported by agentshield
· · high · reported by agentshield

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 2, 2026	Flagged42	—	agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner ·!: timeoutagent-audit-kit ·!: timeoutnerlo-behavioral ·!: timeoutnerlo-install-instruction ·!: timeoutnerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 250
Dismissed as false positives: 1
Not reviewed: 4

Out of 255 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 2 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 4 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

1 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: GHSA-f88m-g3jw-g9cj · Files: /repo/workers/webhooks/test/echo-subscriber/bun.lock · reported by osv-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

6 GHSA-frvp-7c67-39w9
Files: /repo/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/package-lock.json and 3 more · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
4 GHSA-2gcr-mfcq-wcc3
Files: /repo/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/package-lock.json and 1 more · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-35p6-xmwp-9g52
Files: /repo/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-3hrh-pfw6-9m5x
Files: /repo/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/package-lock.json and 1 more · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-4c8g-83qw-93j6
Files: /repo/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/package-lock.json and 1 more · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-88fw-hqm2-52qc
Files: /repo/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/bun.lock, /repo/workers/mcp/package-lock.json and 1 more · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-f577-qrjj-4474

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-11525
Files: bun.lock · reported by trivy

Not reviewed

4 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: skills-missing-telemetry-commands/discover-changelog.md, skills-missing-telemetry-.claude/commands/discover-changelog.md, skills-missing-governance-commands/discover-changelog.md and 1 more · Files: commands/discover-changelog.md, .claude/commands/discover-changelog.md · reported by agentshield

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and sensitive data access risks identified

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/bun.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p · /repo/bun.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
agents-prompt-extraction-135 · .claude/agents/overview-writer.md · high · reported by agentshield
agents-prompt-extraction-683 · .claude/agents/overview-writer.md · high · reported by agentshield
agents-prompt-extraction-928 · .claude/agents/overview-writer.md · high · reported by agentshield
permissions-no-deny-list · .claude/settings.json · high · reported by agentshield
agents-prompt-extraction-135 · agents/overview-writer.md · high · reported by agentshield
· · high · reported by agentshield

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

releases

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged42

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at