Loading the registry…
Use this skill when MaxTAC Android needs a loop that models an Android app's user-facing resources and systematically walks activities, deep links, forms, WebViews, share targets, notifications, and other user-facing inputs for security auditing while respecting scope and safety constraints.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
3 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'philo-groves/maxtac (maxtac-android-input-loop)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'philo-groves/maxtac (maxtac-android-input-loop)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
146 findings · 37.9s
v0.3.74
8 findings · 23.6s
v0.1.0
7 findings · 10.6s
v0.1.0
15 findings · 10.6s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.3s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.3s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 176 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 3 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 171 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
4 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/plugins/maxtac-apple-systems/.codex-plugin/plugin.json, /repo/plugins/maxtac-microsoft-systems/.codex-plugin/plugin.json, /repo/plugins/maxtac-android/.codex-plugin/plugin.json and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-shell-inline-command
Files: /repo/plugins/maxtac-microsoft-systems/skills/maxtac-msrc-lpac-proof/scripts/lpac-proof.py · reported by nerlo-install-instruction
87 The model's answer could not be read.
Rules: SQL_INJECTION_STRING_FORMAT, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-py-dynamic-exec, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-fetch-raw-then-run and 9 more · Files: /repo/plugins/maxtac-core/skills/maxtac-core-subagents/scripts/auditor_registry.py, /repo/plugins/maxtac-apple-systems/skills/maxtac-asb-ipsw/scripts/ipsw-provenance.py, /repo/plugins/maxtac-binary/skills/maxtac-dast-debugger/scripts/debug-evidence.py and 56 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, nerlo-behavioral, nerlo-install-instruction and 1 more
84 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: PIPELINE_TAINT_FLOW, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact · Files: /repo/plugins/maxtac-source/skills/maxtac-sast-opengrep/references/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/maxtac-cloud/skills/maxtac-cloud-runtime-boundary/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/maxtac-cloud/skills/maxtac-cloud-data-exposure/SKILL.md and 73 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, nerlo-install-instruction
Critical vulnerabilities found, including SQL injection and sensitive data handling.
The artifact contains critical SQL injection vulnerabilities in `auditor_registry.py`, which could allow for unauthorized database manipulation. Additionally, multiple critical findings from the 'bearer' scanner indicate potential sensitive data handling or egress capabilities across various scripts, including those related to data export, provenance, debugging, fuzzing, and auditing. These findings are present in files such as `jadx-export.py`, `ipsw-provenance.py`, `debug-evidence.py`, `fuzz-campaign.py`, `ghidra-export.py`, `audit-helper.py`, `lpac-proof.py`, `codebase_memory_mcp.py`, `finding_intake.py`, and `source_scan.py`. Further high-severity findings suggest additional sensitive data handling in `proof-packet.py` and `ipsw-provenance.py`.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Showing 3 of 3; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.